Skip to Content
Top
Blood & Breath Test Refusal

Knoxville Blood & Breath Test Refusal Attorney

17 Years of DUI Defense in Knoxville Including Test Refusal Cases

Tennessee’s implied consent law, codified at Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-10-406, deems every driver on Tennessee roads to have consented to chemical testing the moment they get behind the wheel. When an officer has probable cause to believe you committed a DUI-related offense, that consent is already on record. Refusing the post-arrest evidentiary breath, blood, or oral fluid test triggers civil penalties that are separate from any DUI charge itself. You can be found not guilty of DUI and still lose your license for the refusal.

Attorney Joseph Fanduzz is certified in DUI Detection and Standardized Field Sobriety Testing, which means he evaluates these cases with direct knowledge of how chemical tests are supposed to be administered. He examines not just whether the law was followed, but whether the officer’s procedure was correct at every step. That technical foundation, combined with 17 years handling DUI cases in Knoxville across General Session Court, Criminal Court, and Federal Court, shapes how we approach every refusal case.

If you’ve been arrested after refusing a BAC test, call (865) 896-9971 or contact us online for a free consultation. We’re available 24/7.

Penalties for Refusing a Chemical Test in Tennessee

An implied consent violation is a civil penalty, not a criminal charge, but its consequences are real. As of January 1, 2026, under SB1400/HB1204, the minimum driver’s license revocation periods are:

  • First offense (no prior DUI conviction in the preceding 10 years): 18-month minimum revocation
  • Second offense or prior DUI conviction within 10 years: 2-year revocation
  • Refusal after a crash resulting in serious bodily injury: 2-year revocation
  • Refusal after a crash resulting in one or more fatalities: 5-year revocation

If you were driving on a license that was already revoked, suspended, or cancelled due to a prior conviction at the time of refusal, the stakes escalate further. That situation converts the violation to a Class A misdemeanor carrying up to $1,000 in fines, a mandatory minimum of five days in jail, and a required ignition interlock device.

One procedural protection worth knowing: under § 55-10-406(d)(3), an officer must advise you of the consequences of refusal before requesting the test. If the officer skips that advisement, the court has no authority to suspend your license for the refusal.

Blood Test vs. Breath Test: The Key Distinction

Tennessee’s implied consent law treats these two tests differently, and that distinction matters. Breath tests are covered by implied consent automatically through the act of driving on public roads. Blood tests require either your written consent and signed waiver, a valid search warrant, or exigent circumstances before a refusal can trigger civil penalties. SB1400/HB1204 also added oral fluid (saliva) tests to the statute, effective May 5, 2025. Refusing a saliva test now carries the same civil penalties as refusing a breath test.

For the post-arrest evidentiary blood test to be properly obtained, one of the following must apply:

  • Written consent: You signed the implied consent waiver at the time of the request
  • Search warrant: Law enforcement obtained judicial authorization
  • Exigent circumstances: Conditions made it impractical to obtain a warrant before evidence dissipated

Note that under § 55-10-406(f), an unconscious driver may not be subjected to a blood test without a search warrant or exigent circumstances.

Arrested for refusing to take a BAC test? Call (865) 896-9971 or contact us online.

Read More Read Less
  • NACDL
    NACDL
  • TACDL
    TACDL
  • Tennessee Bar Association
    Tennessee Bar Association
  • Knoxville Bar Association
    Knoxville Bar Association
  • Reduced Sentence 1st Degree Murder
  • Reduced 51 Years to 3-6 Years 1st Degree Murder
  • New Hearing 1st Degree Murder
  • Reduced Charge Aggravated Rape
“Mr. Fanduzz is committed to nothing but the BEST outcome for his clients.”
Nearly two years ago, I was charged with DUI and Speeding. Due to my occupation, a conviction could be detrimental to my career. I contacted Mr. Fanduzz and he was able to have my case placed on Judicial Diversion, which required me to serve only one year supervised probation (reduced from two years) and court cost. I retained my drivers license and did not have to purchase expensive car insurance. Unfortunately, while on probation, I was charged with two counts of assault and aggravated assault. Along with these new charges, I also faced violation of my probation and the original DUI. All charges were considered Felonies at this point. There was no hesitation in hiring him to represent me again. Mr. Fanduzz not only kept me well informed, he also skillfully and agressively argued on my behalf. He arranged for my probation and judicial diversion to be reinstated and the felony assault charges to be dismissed in exchange for a plea to a misdemeanor offence. Needless to say, I highly recommend Mr. Fanduzz because of his attention to detail and commitment to have the BEST possible outcome for his clients.
N.D.
Meet Your Attorney
Joseph Fanduzz is in an elite group of trial lawyers who have attended and graduated from the National Criminal Defense College.